Wednesday March 17, 2010
A study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) reported that although most cancer centers now have a palliative care program, significant gaps and delays in the delivery of care remain. The study looked at the availability of palliative care at U.S. cancer centers, both those designated as National Cancer Institutes (NCI) and non-NCI centers, as well as executives attitudes towards palliative care. The results showed that palliative care was more readily available and integrated into National Cancer Institute hospitals than non-NCI cancer centers but that services varied widely.
Palliative care should be a standard cancer treatment, not just a last-ditch effort to promote comfort at the very end of life. Palliative care is expert pain and symptom management, focusing on the entire person rather than just the illness. Don't cancer patients deserve this kind of treatment at the time of diagnosis, continuing throughout the trajectory of their illness whatever the outcome? The American Society of Clinical Oncology has a vision to have full integration of palliative care services as a routine part of cancer care by the year 2020. We have a long way to go if we are going to meet that goal. The first step is to recognize palliative care as part of a comprehensive cancer treatment plan, not just as end-of-life care.
The ideal scenario is for a patient to be able to visit a cancer center for expert chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, or any combination of cancer treatment. While at the center, the patient has a consultation with a palliative care team. The palliative care team would oversee the patient's physical comfort while going through aggressive treatments, offer emotional and spiritual counseling and support, and be available to discuss end-of-life wishes if and when the time comes. If cancer treatment is successful, the patient benefits from expert pain and symptom management and support. If cancer treatment fails, the transition to hospice care is smooth and the patient is more prepared for what lies ahead.
I hope to see more cancer centers and major medical centers alike integrate palliative care into their cancer treatment programs. Do you have an exciting palliative care program at your hospital? Share below!
Friday March 5, 2010
An article in Time magazine told of a small study led by doctors at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston of parents of children who had died of cancer. Of 141 parents interviewed, 19 said they had thought about asking a doctor to hasten their child's death. Thirteen of the parents reported that had actually discussed hastening their child's death with caregivers. An additional 34% of parents said that in retrospect, they would have considered hastening their child's death if the child had been in uncontrollable pain.
This was a small study but I think it speaks volumes about a parents need to see their child comfortable. It's unthinkable to loose a child to cancer and many parents don't want to "give up" on a cure but when it's inevitable that the child will die, parents want nothing more than to spend as much quality time with their child as possible, as long as the child is not suffering. This is why palliative care for children is so essential, and why California has passed an initiative that guarantees children access to palliative care while receiving concurrent curative treatments. The Senate version of the Medicare reform bill includes such a provision as well. If every child has access to palliative care as standard form of cancer treatment without having to give up any other care, parents would be less likely to see their son or daughter suffer in uncontrollable pain.
The article in Time made one error that I would like to point out. The author writes that in a difference between treatment of uncontrolled pain for adults versus children, more adults are likely to receive palliative sedation than children. This makes absolute sense, since parents want to spend as much time with their child awake as possible. The error made was reporting that palliative sedation was morphine-induced. Palliative sedation is not induced by morphine, although morphine may be used to treat pain. Sedation is induced by sedatives, such as barbituates. Learn more about Palliative Sedation.
Learn more about Palliative Care for Children
The Nick Snow Act in California
Pain Management
Wednesday March 3, 2010
A report in the Annals of Internal Medicine looked at the incidence of patients admitted to hospice care with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, how many of them received shocks, and how hospices were managing the devices. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD's) are devices implanted under the skin near the heart that monitors the heart's activity and automatically delivers a shock if necessary. Patients who are admitted to hospice care with these devices still activated may receive shocks at the end of their life.
The study found that 97% of hospices responding to the survey had admitted patients with ICD's. Only 10% of the hospices had policies on managing the ICD's and over 50% of patients with the devices had been shocked. Less than half of patients admitted to hospice with ICD's had the shocking mechanism deactivated.
I would be interested to know how many patients with the devices want them deactivated and how many actually want to keep the defibrillator functioning. If a patient is in the dying process and his heart goes into an abnormal rhythm (which would be pretty common, especially in patients with heart disease) an ICD that has not been deactivated would deliver shocks to his heart. This could potentially prolong the dying process and cause the patient discomfort. Are hospices doing enough to educate patients with ICD's about how they might impact the dying experience? Are hospices even addressing this issue at all? With only 10% reporting having policies on ICD management, it makes me wonder.
Does your hospice have a policy for managing ICD's?
Do you or your loved one on hospice have an ICD and if so, how is it being managed?
Wednesday March 3, 2010
This month's Palliative Care Grand Rounds (PCGR) - a blog carnival of the best palliative care, hospice, death, and bereavement blogs - is up at Larry Beresford's Growth House blog. Larry has done a wonderful job of compiling the best blogs for your reading pleasure. Take a look at this month's installment at Growth House and check out the main PCGR site for past installments.