1. Home
  2. Health
  3. Palliative Care

Bouvia v. Supreme Court (CA)

By , About.com Guide

Updated June 29, 2008

About.com Health's Disease and Condition content is reviewed by the Medical Review Board

Definition: The California Court of Appeal ruled on June 5, 1986 that a patient in a public hospital was entitled to making the decision to require the removal of a nasogastric tube which was inserted and maintained against her will and without her consent by physicians who sought to keep her alive through force feeding. The patient, Elizabeth Bouvia, was a 28-year-old quadriplegic with severe cerebral palsy. In reaching its decision, the court recognized that a patient who is mentally competent and understands the risks involved has a right to refuse treatment, and that the state's interest in preserving life does not outweigh this right.
Explore Palliative Care
About.com Special Features

8 Ways to Cut Drug Costs

Learn how to save money on medications with these recommendations. More >

Healthy Bodies, Healthy Minds

Keep yourself, and your family, happy and healthy this fall with these tips. More >

We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.
  1. Home
  2. Health
  3. Palliative Care
  4. Glossary
  5. Bouvia v. Supreme Court: Supreme Court Decisions Regarding Elizabeth Bouvia>

©2009 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company.

All rights reserved.