1. Home
  2. Health
  3. Palliative Care

Bouvia v. Supreme Court (CA)

By Angela Morrow, RN, About.com

Updated June 29, 2008

About.com Health's Disease and Condition content is reviewed by the Medical Review Board

Definition: The California Court of Appeal ruled on June 5, 1986 that a patient in a public hospital was entitled to making the decision to require the removal of a nasogastric tube which was inserted and maintained against her will and without her consent by physicians who sought to keep her alive through force feeding. The patient, Elizabeth Bouvia, was a 28-year-old quadriplegic with severe cerebral palsy. In reaching its decision, the court recognized that a patient who is mentally competent and understands the risks involved has a right to refuse treatment, and that the state's interest in preserving life does not outweigh this right.
Explore Palliative Care
About.com Special Features

Learn how you can reduce your your numbers with these nutrition and exercise tips. More >

Keep yourself, and your family, happy and healthy this fall with these tips. More >

We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.
  1. Home
  2. Health
  3. Palliative Care
  4. Glossary
  5. Bouvia v. Supreme Court: Supreme Court Decisions Regarding Elizabeth Bouvia>

©2009 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company.

All rights reserved.